Planetary Systems in the Universe: Observation, Formation and Evolution
ASP Conference Series, Vol. 3 x 10 s , 1999
A.J. Penny, P. Artymowicz, A.-M. Lagrange, and S.S. Russell, eds.
Observations of YSO Circumstellar Discs
D. Ward-Thompson
Dept of Physics & Astronomy, Cardiff University, PO Box 913, Cardiff
P. Andre
CEA, Service d'Astrophysique, CE. Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
O. P. Lay
Jet Propulsion Lab, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California
Abstract. We present the results of short baseline interferometry obser-
vations at submillimetre wavelengths, using a two-element interferometer
comprising the JCMT/CSO, of circumstellar discs around young YSOs.
We model data for the Class protostar IRAS03282 and the Class I pro-
tostar L1709B with discs and compare them with previously published
results. We find evidence for the ratio of the disc to envelope mass to
increase as the objects evolve.
1. Introduction
Circumstellar discs now appear to be an ubiquitous phenomenon around newly-
formed stars. One of the most direct ways to study discs is to use submm
interferometry. For optically thin emission, the submm flux density is propor-
tional to the mass of the circumstellar disc. A number of young stars have now
been studied with submm interferometers, including that involving the linking
of the JCMT & CSO to perform short-baseline interferometry (SBI).
2. IRAS 03282
IRAS 03282 is a Class YSO (Andre, Ward-Thompson & Barsony 1993; 2000),
which is in a very early proto-stellar phase. Figure 1(a) shows a plot of flux den-
sity against projected baseline for our IRAS 03282 data. We note that the data
are consistent with a constant flux density of ~0.4Jy from ~100-200kA, corre-
sponding to angular resolution from 1.25-2.5 arcsec. At an assumed distance of
350pc (Bachiller & Cernicharo 1986) this corresponds to scales of 440-880AU.
We interpret this as an unresolved component, presumably a disc, around this
source. The outer radius of this disc is thus <220AU.
Using typical assumptions (e.g. Andre et al. 2000) of optically thin dust
emission at T=30K and mass opacity at this frequency of K=0.0015m 2 kg _1 , a
flux density of 0.4Jy at a distance of 350pc corresponds to a mass of ~0.1Mq.
1
2
Ward-Thompson, Andre <fe Lay
Figure 1. Plots of flux density versus projected baseline. (a)
IRAS03282: Note that there is no real trend in the data, and a constant
flux density of 0.4Jy is consistent with the data. This corresponds to
an unresolved disc of O.1M of radius <220AU. (b) L1709B: The solid
line is a gaussian fit to the data with FWHM ~60AU.
The single-dish submm flux density at the same wavelength is 1.4Jy in a 13 arcsec
beam (Barsony et al 1998). This corresponds to a scale of ~4500AU. This is
clearly emission from the envelope around this Class protostar (see: Barsony
et al 1998). Thus the ratio of the flux in the interferometer measurements to
the single dish flux, which approximates to the ratio between the disc emission
and the envelope emission, is ~30%.
3. L1709B
L1709B is a Class I protostar at a distance of 140pc, and is among the stronger
mm sources in the p Oph dark cloud star-forming region (Andre & Montmerle
1994). Figure 1(b) shows a plot of flux density against projected baseline for our
L1709B data. In this case we see that the data are not consistent with constant
flux density on all baselines, so we have at least partially resolved the emission.
We make the assumption that the emission is arising from an optically thin
disc, which has a gaussian radial density profile. We plot a gaussian fit to the
data and find a FWHM flux density of 0.4Jy on a scale of 175kA, corresponding
to a FWHM disc size of ~0.45 arcsec, or ~60AU at the distance of L1709B.
The single dish flux density of L1709B is 1.5Jy (Andre et al 1993), and we
attribute this to the extended envelope emission around this source. The ratio
of interferometer FWHM flux to single dish flux, under typical assumptions, is
therefore ~30%. We have also observed three other sources but can only place
limits on their fluxes.
4. Comparison with previous SBI data
We can compare our results with those of other workers using the same inter-
ferometer on similar sources. These are listed in Table 1, along with our new
Observations of circumstellar discs
3
Source
L4oucl
Class
QT3T
aril
J IjM 1
Ratio
Name
Name
r lux
scale
r lux
Civ')
{ J y>
_I_J 1_ 440111111
J. t^IotUo
n
u
0.12 4
1 00-200
1 Q 6
1. . iJ
fi%
U /(J
SMM3
o
0.2 4
J.VJVJ ZjVJVJ
1.8 7
11%
J- J- /u
VT, A 1 fi9^
ytv wjjii
n
n ^ 3
VJ.fJ
11U ZiUU
48,9
4:
19%
/o
NCC1 333IR AS? A
T-V ^rym l g
J. <^1 us
o
u
n 4 4
\J . 1
1 00-200
1UU ZiUU
16
O . -1
13%
1O/0
FIR SI
kJL.1 JJl_.Ho
f)
1 3 4
-1 .O
1 00-200
7 7
TT3 A^0^9&9
r L-l SL Lit)
o
u
4 1
1 00-900
1UU Z(UU
1 4 5
_L .4:
9Q%
LFAM1
p Oph
<i x
140-200
1.8 1
<55%
IRS53
Serpens
I
0.15 4
100-200
1.7 7
9%
SVS13A
Perseus
I
0.7 4
100-200
2.7 6
26%
SVS20
Perseus
I
0.3 4
100-200
l.l 6
27%
L1709B
p Oph
I
0.4 1
175
1.5 1
27%
L1551-IRS5
Taurus
I
2.2 2
50
7.8 6
28%
E124
p Oph
II
<0.5 1
140-200
0.9 1
<60%
DoAr25
p Oph
II
<l x
140-200
0.7 1
<100%
HLTau
Taurus
II
2.6 2
50
2.6 6
100%
Table 1. Comparison with previous SBI data. Notes: 4 This work; 2 Lay et
al 1994; 3 Pudritz ct al 1996; 4 Brown ct al 2000; 5 Barsony et al 1998; 6 Chandler
& Richer 2000; 7 Casali et al 1993; 8 Andre et al 1993; 9 Ward-Thompson 1993.
detections and upper limits. The SBI flux corresponds to the disc, and the
single-dish (14") JCMT flux is emission from the disc-plus-envelope. Thus we
can see a possible trend emerging from this table. All except one of the Class
sources with detections have SBI to single dish flux ratios of <20%. All except
one of the Class I sources with detections have SBI to single dish flux ratios of
20-30%. The one detected Class II source has an SBI to single dish flux ratio of
100%. We interpret this as a possible evolutionary trend from Class — >I — >II,
caused by the ratio of the disc to envelope mass increasing with time as a result
of the envelope matter accreting onto the disc.
References
Andre & Montmerle, 1994, ApJ, 420, 837
Andre, Ward-Thompson & Barsony, 1993, ApJ, 406, 122
Andre, Ward-Thompson & Barsony, 2000, 'Protostars & Planets IV, 59
Bachiller & Cernicharo, 1986, A&A, 168, 262
Barsony et al 1998, ApJ, 509, 733
Brown et al 2000, MNRAS, in press
Casali et al 1993, A&A, 275, 195
Chandler & Richer, 2000, ApJ, 530, 851
Lay et al 1994, ApJ, 434, L75
Pudritz ct al 1996, ApJ, 470, L123
Ward-Thompson 1993, MNRAS, 265, 493